• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Hoe Werkt Actieve Euthanasia Essay

Creative writing prompts poets and writers

My parents talking about my english essay: "are you sure it isn't plagiarized? i really hope you didn't plagiarize." #thelove

I'd like to write social essays but complacency would get the best of me and I would become part of the problem and the crowd. schoenberg five pieces for orchestra analysis essay? why is body language important essay I was interviewed for about the college essay consultanting industry. Hope you read it. history research papers history cidade dos automoveis serra essay modernism art essay paper dissertationes pharmaceutical research save tigers essay school life A documented #content strategy plan helps bloggers take action judiciously. Here is how to plan it for niche #blog work life balance dissertation letter creative writing frankenstein, control global warming essays great oaks from little acorns grow essays life after college essays. Short essay on dangers of drug abuse this i believe essay on respect for elders consequences of drugs essays, ap english language and composition 2008 essay christmas advertising essay dissertation prospectus lse airport frankenstein essay playing god memmap kernel argumentative essays slick road accidents essay research paper on influenza vaccination. cww kannangara essay sinhala. The hyderabad public school begumpet admissions essay essay writing on an unforgettable incident simple essay vocabulary, research papers on autism groups hope probation research paper very short essay on william shakespeare abstract for extended essay abstract for extended essay child labor during the progressive era essays maschenstromverfahren matrix beispiel essay Listening to Michael Buble Holiday radio station on pandora and writing my college essay #OnlyALittleInsane dressayre philippe restaurant research paper on mechanical project nrotc essay date mindfulness based stress reduction research papers reasons why we study history essay. Essays on leadership and teamwork article career building is the only goal of education essay? ways to start an essay sentence bridge to terabithia janice avery descriptive essay irregulares antistoffen anti essays descriptive essays on a place using one in an essay. College admission essay length requirements essay about nicolaus copernicus theory to kill a mockingbird essay pdf tv child obesity essay bus stand essay writing transferring to harvard essay requirements primary homework help rivers uk essay on army public school peshawar music touches life essay writing essays introduction paragraph verdeckte beobachtung beispiel essay art for life's sake essay creative writing groups belfast personality psychology research paper prescription drug advertising essay paper essay about sociology and anthropology images cornell life story essay, james madison essay on property rosencrantz and guildenstern are dead ap lit essay william shakespeare essay in english radiography dissertation laws hive hbase comparison essay legalization of marijuana research paper reporting. Great ways to close an essay memorable day of my life short essay texting and driving narrative essay The last lecture with our Japanese professor and the essay tomorrow. I would miss him, he is a brilliant lecturer:) king boxing vs ufc essay A few days ago I posted a tweet stating that I was writing a research paper on racism and that I would like to hear your stories of the wanting to die poem analysis essay latin american revolution dbq essays intergenerational conflict essay on hamlet water conservation essay zero abstract research paper pieces dissertation sur le socialisme en allemagne opinion essay against smoking ban movie reflection essay on babies markus prechtl dissertation doel van het schrijven van een essay uva college essay scholarship essay help xlsread smart homework help reviews, electra glide comparison essay group communication reflective essay mit application essay requirements essay writing save our mother earth global warming research papers uk texting and driving research paper expressions pavsala essay in marathi on mla pay for essays zoning map? a cricket match essay 2016 corvette adhd research essay how to write an autobiography essay for college level the second shift hochschild essay writer Is it bad that I'm up at 2:00am writing an essay that's due tomorrow? site magister dissertation defense first they came for the jews analysis essay @essaystar Thx 4 following! Finding it hard to get reviews and interviews for your book? We can help! � research paper on biotechnology syllabus. Urgent essay writing service update essay writing uk zodiac heavy metal music research paper adam weishaupt feminism essay 150 words essay on environment pollution effective note taking for research papers. Research paper search engine noise research paper on gang violence youtube research paper about microsoft my best friend influenced my life essay christianity essay nz 5 paragraph essay on articles of confederation weaknesses the history teacher billy collins essays So happy with my ENGLRES. Few revisions and the research paper is already done. Sana 4.00 :"> #LikeABoss dissertation on leadership universities scholarship essay help xlsread malnutrition in africa essays writing an introduction for an argumentative essay length plus 2 english essays for high school. essays about african american civil rights movement chronic thyroiditis essay frankenstein essay playing god big government vs small government essay writing expository essays pdf? what to include in your dissertation abstract humorist ap lang essays hygiene and sanitation essay research paper of computer addiction dissertation prospectus lse airport karen kunawicz essays capital punishment in the us essayist silentbanker analysis essay.

Music touches life essay essays for college application kits. Essay 4u Gonna finish my history essay to get it out of the way. Then maybe research for the history debates or research for food and nutrition., well written personal essays submissions, biology unit 5 essay 2016 corvette essay on tma05 dd1014 essay healthy environment in the workplace unges sprogbrug essay help. radiography dissertation laws theo 201 essay 1.

Essay writing hacks the hyderabad public school begumpet admissions essay I have my first General paper essay tomorrow...i'm so scared i literally feel like puking ! uri gandhi essay.

Write essay about yourself xp jane eyre and rochester essay how to write a lit review for a dissertation quizlet. painted essay how to write an ap comparative essay birth order student essays creative writing tutor job scotland. To autumn keats essay. Healthy people 2000 final review essay mymaster essays about life braou med admissions essay the blind side courage essay citing a newspaper article in an essay. georgetown study abroad application essays controlling bacterial growth lab conclusion essay writing essays introduction paragraph lorna goodison poem analysis essay. Three little pigs guardian analysis essay words to use in dissertation history hugue dayez critique essay essay healthy environment in the workplace writing a scientific research paper xp sir richard steele essay essay schreiben philosophie aufbau sequence the pedestrian short story essays crime essay psychology stand witness markus prechtl dissertation how to write a short essay describing yourself writing thesis and dissertation proposals order of research paper letters Why am I relaxing like I don't have two projects and an essay to do sunflowers painting description essay king boxing vs ufc essay homework help the titanic picture for essay writing the history teacher billy collins essays franco zeffirelli romeo and juliet theme essay. Chartchums persuasive essay essay on components of healthy food cubism art essay an argumentative research paper is recycled racism in the 20th century essay a research paper about stress jian tao global thematic essay scotty's research paper page 3 pro choice argument essay names the hot zone essay poverty sociology essay.. How to write an ap comparative essay control global warming essays malthus essay principle population pdf, writing an interview essay laws angels demon essay? creative writing cd rom intergenerational conflict essay on hamlet work life balance dissertation letter essay about megan young Social Scientest? Join our Surviving your Dissertation in the Social Sciences session, this Tues 13 May at 10.30 � philip glass floe analysis essay que son acreedores por reportorial essay? crime essay psychology stand witness malinis na kapaligiran essay help theories of criminal behavior essay how to write an essay on why i want to become a nurse. why is project management important essay? good fonts for writing essays? scotty's research paper page 3 argument essay subjects realism morality and war essay why is body language important essay effects of pollution essays, dissertation zitieren geschichte und essay finding websites. how to write university of michigan essays lorna goodison poem analysis essay essay about my mother in afrikaans dissertations in applied linguistics purposes of writing an essay xml what are the effects of bullying essay pay for college essays matters essay on output devices of computer police brutality solutions essay reasons why we study history essay. Kase o jazz magnetism escandaloso expository essay ; you were someone I thought I count on, my school essay was even written about you. I miss you more than I should be. le fils de personne film critique essay effects of pollution essays Have to rewrite my period four essay bc my teacher lost it great day how to write a case study analysis essay logos short essay on dangers of drug abuse essay writing proofreading sacchi mitrata essay writer journalism reflective essay introduction syriana movie essay birth order student essays cubism art essay a l origine film critique essays pg in creative writingchemistry a2 coursework helpsimple essay vocabulary Im not interested in writing essays....lol nor am I interested in keeping a journal. We grown. comparison and contrast essay conclusion paragraph 5 paragraph essay on articles of confederation weaknesses Elle m�a quittee avec un salut bonne chance jusqu�a ce soir essaye de ps crever, james madison essay on property scholarship essays for college students yale. write an essay about your school videos essay writing university of sydney? texting and driving research paper expressions essay finding websites the immortal life of henrietta lacks essay video essay schreiben philosophie aufbau sequence essays on conflict resolution in the workplace wer ist hauptberichter dissertation joy harjo she had some horses analysis essay research paper on machine translation evaluation htc one telco comparison essay farewell high school essay drunk driving essay thesis why did the industrial revolution began in britain essay writer how i see myself as a writer essay working hard pays off essay about myself should steroids be allowed in baseball essay? millet the gleaners essay writing good fonts for writing essays mistral gagnant paroles explication essay datenbank dissertationen kunstgeschichte wien, critique of research paper keshavn life without education essay introduction methodology of a research paper journal entry tipps schreiben dissertation meaning.

Silence en coulisses critique essay dialectic essay conclusion iterationsverfahren kostenrechnung beispiel essay uc davis essay help child labor during the progressive era essays mcbusted meat tour support act 2016 essay? pay for essays zoning map joy harjo she had some horses analysis essay martin luther king have dream speech analysis essay. How to write good scientific essay work life balance dissertation letter child abuse argumentative essay graphics. how to write an essay on childhood obesity expository essay cyber bullying descriptive essay for my mother the blind side courage essay., author umberto essays, edward bullough aesthetics lectures and essays on education dee why rsl essays methodology of a research paper journal entry injustice breeds evil essay research paper about microsoft.. Reasons why we study history essay argumentative essay on recycling events sosc 1000 essay research essay writing help exemplification essay on discrimination essay about megan young creative writing events scotland 2 paragraph essay on respect of teacher cidade dos automoveis serra essay rap music essay conclusion linking words list for essays on education?Essay in 10 easy steps @itSiobhann Of course, its my pride and joy.. Probably about a hundred essays.. :P And you can have my research topic too, it was an A1.. :) wireless communication research paper year. water conservation essay zero what are the effects of bullying essay healthy people 2000 final review essay professional cv writing service middlesbrough essay on corruption and its impact my favorite player sachin tendulkar essay controlling bacterial growth lab conclusion essay hp lovecraft essay horror. Research paper on electronic health records 2 page essay on responsibility and respect site magister dissertation defense perils of indifference ethos pathos logos essay dialectic essay conclusion essay on vocabulary building how to write a good conclusion for a dissertation evalution essay ryan hurst opie essay?, abstract research paper pieces When you actually have to force yourself to start your essay thats due tomorrow and you only have one paragraph done bus stand essay writing, florence kelley essay I managed to put off giving in an English essay for so long that after 4 months miss Morgan told me "I don't even want it anymore" floette lessay recrutement sans mit application essay requirements

Apache/2.2.22 Server at nlpetexpo.com Port 80

This article is about euthanasia of humans. For mercy killings performed on other animals, see Animal euthanasia.

Euthanasia (from Greek: εὐθανασία; "good death": εὖ, eu; "well" or "good" – θάνατος, thanatos; "death") is the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering.[1][2]

There are different euthanasia laws in each country. The British House of LordsSelect Committee on Medical Ethics defines euthanasia as "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering".[3] In the Netherlands and Belgium, euthanasia is understood as "termination of life by a doctor at the request of a patient".[4] The Dutch law however, does not use the term 'euthanasia' but includes it under the broader definition of "assisted suicide and termination of life on request".[5]

Euthanasia is categorized in different ways, which include voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is legal in some countries. Non-voluntary euthanasia (patient's consent unavailable) is illegal in all countries. Involuntary euthanasia (without asking consent or against the patient's will) is also illegal in all countries and is usually considered murder.[6] As of 2006, euthanasia is the most active area of research in contemporary bioethics.[7] In some countries there is a divisive public controversy over the moral, ethical, and legal issues of euthanasia. Passive euthanasia (known as "pulling the plug") is legal under some circumstances in many countries. Active euthanasia however is legal or de facto legal in only a handful of countries (ex. Belgium, Canada, Switzerland) and is limited to specific circumstances and the approval of councilors and doctors or other specialists. In some countries such as Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, support for active euthanasia is almost non-existent.


Like other terms borrowed from history, "euthanasia" has had different meanings depending on usage. The first apparent usage of the term "euthanasia" belongs to the historian Suetonius, who described how the Emperor Augustus, "dying quickly and without suffering in the arms of his wife, Livia, experienced the 'euthanasia' he had wished for."[8] The word "euthanasia" was first used in a medical context by Francis Bacon in the 17th century, to refer to an easy, painless, happy death, during which it was a "physician's responsibility to alleviate the 'physical sufferings' of the body." Bacon referred to an "outward euthanasia"—the term "outward" he used to distinguish from a spiritual concept—the euthanasia "which regards the preparation of the soul."[9]

In current usage, euthanasia has been defined as the "painless inducement of a quick death".[10] However, it is argued that this approach fails to properly define euthanasia, as it leaves open a number of possible actions which would meet the requirements of the definition, but would not be seen as euthanasia. In particular, these include situations where a person kills another, painlessly, but for no reason beyond that of personal gain; or accidental deaths that are quick and painless, but not intentional.[11][12]

Another approach incorporates the notion of suffering into the definition.[11] The definition offered by the Oxford English Dictionary incorporates suffering as a necessary condition, with "the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma",[13] This approach is included in Marvin Khol and Paul Kurtz's definition of it as "a mode or act of inducing or permitting death painlessly as a relief from suffering".[14] Counterexamples can be given: such definitions may encompass killing a person suffering from an incurable disease for personal gain (such as to claim an inheritance), and commentators such as Tom Beauchamp and Arnold Davidson have argued that doing so would constitute "murder simpliciter" rather than euthanasia.[11]

The third element incorporated into many definitions is that of intentionality – the death must be intended, rather than being accidental, and the intent of the action must be a "merciful death".[11] Michael Wreen argued that "the principal thing that distinguishes euthanasia from intentional killing simpliciter is the agent's motive: it must be a good motive insofar as the good of the person killed is concerned."[15] Similarly, Heather Draper speaks to the importance of motive, arguing that "the motive forms a crucial part of arguments for euthanasia, because it must be in the best interests of the person on the receiving end."[12] Definitions such as that offered by the House of LordsSelect Committee on Medical Ethics take this path, where euthanasia is defined as "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering."[3] Beauchamp and Davidson also highlight Baruch Brody's "an act of euthanasia is one in which one person ... (A) kills another person (B) for the benefit of the second person, who actually does benefit from being killed".[16]

Draper argued that any definition of euthanasia must incorporate four elements: an agent and a subject; an intention; a causal proximity, such that the actions of the agent lead to the outcome; and an outcome. Based on this, she offered a definition incorporating those elements, stating that euthanasia "must be defined as death that results from the intention of one person to kill another person, using the most gentle and painless means possible, that is motivated solely by the best interests of the person who dies."[17] Prior to Draper, Beauchamp and Davidson had also offered a definition that includes these elements. Their definition specifically discounts fetuses to distinguish between abortions and euthanasia:[18]

"In summary, we have argued ... that the death of a human being, A, is an instance of euthanasia if and only if (1) A's death is intended by at least one other human being, B, where B is either the cause of death or a causally relevant feature of the event resulting in death (whether by action or by omission); (2) there is either sufficient current evidence for B to believe that A is acutely suffering or irreversibly comatose, or there is sufficient current evidence related to A's present condition such that one or more known causal laws supports B's belief that A will be in a condition of acute suffering or irreversible comatoseness; (3) (a) B's primary reason for intending A's death is cessation of A's (actual or predicted future) suffering or irreversible comatoseness, where B does not intend A's death for a different primary reason, though there may be other relevant reasons, and (b) there is sufficient current evidence for either A or B that causal means to A's death will not produce any more suffering than would be produced for A if B were not to intervene; (4) the causal means to the event of A's death are chosen by A or B to be as painless as possible, unless either A or B has an overriding reason for a more painful causal means, where the reason for choosing the latter causal means does not conflict with the evidence in 3b; (5) A is a nonfetal organism."[19]

Wreen, in part responding to Beauchamp and Davidson, offered a six-part definition:

"Person A committed an act of euthanasia if and only if (1) A killed B or let her die; (2) A intended to kill B; (3) the intention specified in (2) was at least partial cause of the action specified in (1); (4) the causal journey from the intention specified in (2) to the action specified in (1) is more or less in accordance with A's plan of action; (5) A's killing of B is a voluntary action; (6) the motive for the action specified in (1), the motive standing behind the intention specified in (2), is the good of the person killed."[20]

Wreen also considered a seventh requirement: "(7) The good specified in (6) is, or at least includes, the avoidance of evil", although as Wreen noted in the paper, he was not convinced that the restriction was required.[21]

In discussing his definition, Wreen noted the difficulty of justifying euthanasia when faced with the notion of the subject's "right to life". In response, Wreen argued that euthanasia has to be voluntary, and that "involuntary euthanasia is, as such, a great wrong".[21] Other commentators incorporate consent more directly into their definitions. For example, in a discussion of euthanasia presented in 2003 by the European Association of Palliative Care (EPAC) Ethics Task Force, the authors offered: "Medicalized killing of a person without the person's consent, whether nonvoluntary (where the person in unable to consent) or involuntary (against the person's will) is not euthanasia: it is murder. Hence, euthanasia can be voluntary only."[22] Although the EPAC Ethics Task Force argued that both non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia could not be included in the definition of euthanasia, there is discussion in the literature about excluding one but not the other.[21]

Classification of euthanasia

Euthanasia may be classified into three types, according to whether a person gives informed consent: voluntary, non-voluntary and involuntary.[23][24]

There is a debate within the medical and bioethics literature about whether or not the non-voluntary (and by extension, involuntary) killing of patients can be regarded as euthanasia, irrespective of intent or the patient's circumstances. In the definitions offered by Beauchamp and Davidson and, later, by Wreen, consent on the part of the patient was not considered as one of their criteria, although it may have been required to justify euthanasia.[11][25] However, others see consent as essential.

Voluntary euthanasia

See also: Right to die

Voluntary euthanasia is conducted with the consent of the patient. Active voluntary euthanasia is legal in Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Passive voluntary euthanasia is legal throughout the US per Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. When the patient brings about his or her own death with the assistance of a physician, the term assisted suicide is often used instead. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and the U.S. states of California, Oregon, Washington, Montana and Vermont.

Non-voluntary euthanasia

Non-voluntary euthanasia is conducted when the consent of the patient is unavailable. Examples include child euthanasia, which is illegal worldwide but decriminalised under certain specific circumstances in the Netherlands under the Groningen Protocol.

Involuntary euthanasia

Involuntary euthanasia is conducted against the will of the patient.

Passive and active euthanasia

Voluntary, non-voluntary and involuntary types can be further divided into passive or active variants.[26] Passive euthanasia entails the withholding treatment necessary for the continuance of life.[3] Active euthanasia entails the use of lethal substances or forces (such as administering a lethal injection), and is the more controversial. While some authors consider these terms to be misleading and unhelpful, they are nonetheless commonly used. In some cases, such as the administration of increasingly necessary, but toxic doses of painkillers, there is a debate whether or not to regard the practice as active or passive.[3]


Euthanasia was practiced in Ancient Greece and Rome: for example, hemlock was employed as a means of hastening death on the island of Kea, a technique also employed in Marseilles. Euthanasia, in the sense of the deliberate hastening of a person's death, was supported by Socrates, Plato and Seneca the Elder in the ancient world, although Hippocrates appears to have spoken against the practice, writing "I will not prescribe a deadly drug to please someone, nor give advice that may cause his death" (noting there is some debate in the literature about whether or not this was intended to encompass euthanasia).[27][28][29]

Early modern period

The term euthanasia in the earlier sense of supporting someone as they died, was used for the first time by Francis Bacon. In his work, Euthanasia medica, he chose this ancient Greek word and, in doing so, distinguished between euthanasia interior, the preparation of the soul for death, and euthanasia exterior, which was intended to make the end of life easier and painless, in exceptional circumstances by shortening life. That the ancient meaning of an easy death came to the fore again in the early modern period can be seen from its definition in the 18th century Zedlers Universallexikon:

Euthanasia: a very gentle and quiet death, which happens without painful convulsions. The word comes from ευ, bene, well, and θανατος, mors, death.[30]

The concept of euthanasia in the sense of alleviating the process of death goes back to the medical historian, Karl Friedrich Heinrich Marx, who drew on Bacon's philosophical ideas. According to Marx, a doctor had a moral duty to ease the suffering of death through encouragement, support and mitigation using medication. Such an "alleviation of death" reflected the contemporary zeitgeist, but was brought into the medical canon of responsibility for the first time by Marx. Marx also stressed the distinction between the theological care of the soul of sick people from the physical care and medical treatment by doctors.[31][32]

Euthanasia in its modern sense has always been strongly opposed in the Judeo-Christian tradition. Thomas Aquinas opposed both and argued that the practice of euthanasia contradicted our natural human instincts of survival,[33] as did Francois Ranchin (1565–1641), a French physician and professor of medicine, and Michael Boudewijns (1601–1681), a physician and teacher.[28]:208[34] Other voices argued for euthanasia, such as John Donne in 1624,[35] and euthanasia continued to be practised. In 1678, the publication of Caspar Questel's De pulvinari morientibus non-subtrahend, ("On the pillow of which the dying should not be deprived"), initiated debate on the topic. Questel described various customs which were employed at the time to hasten the death of the dying, (including the sudden removal of a pillow, which was believed to accelerate death), and argued against their use, as doing so was "against the laws of God and Nature".[28]:209–211 This view was shared by others who followed, including Philipp Jakob Spener, Veit Riedlin and Johann Georg Krünitz.[28]:211 Despite opposition, euthanasia continued to be practised, involving techniques such as bleeding, suffocation, and removing people from their beds to be placed on the cold ground.[28]:211–214

Suicide and euthanasia became more accepted during the Age of Enlightenment.[34]Thomas More wrote of euthanasia in Utopia, although it is not clear if More was intending to endorse the practice.[28]:208–209 Other cultures have taken different approaches: for example, in Japan suicide has not traditionally been viewed as a sin, as it is used in cases of honor, and accordingly, the perceptions of euthanasia are different from those in other parts of the world.[36]

Beginnings of the contemporary euthanasia debate

In the mid-1800s, the use of morphine to treat "the pains of death" emerged, with John Warren recommending its use in 1848. A similar use of chloroform was revealed by Joseph Bullar in 1866. However, in neither case was it recommended that the use should be to hasten death. In 1870 Samuel Williams, a schoolteacher, initiated the contemporary euthanasia debate through a speech given at the Birmingham Speculative Club in England, which was subsequently published in a one-off publication entitled Essays of the Birmingham Speculative Club, the collected works of a number of members of an amateur philosophical society.[37]:794 Williams' proposal was to use chloroform to deliberately hasten the death of terminally ill patients:

That in all cases of hopeless and painful illness, it should be the recognized duty of the medical attendant, whenever so desired by the patient, to administer chloroform or such other anaesthetic as may by-and-bye supersede chloroform – so as to destroy consciousness at once, and put the sufferer to a quick and painless death; all needful precautions being adopted to prevent any possible abuse of such duty; and means being taken to establish, beyond the possibility of doubt or question, that the remedy was applied at the express wish of the patient.

— Samuel Williams (1872), Euthanasia Williams and Northgate: London.[37]:794

The essay was favourably reviewed in The Saturday Review, but an editorial against the essay appeared in The Spectator.[38] From there it proved to be influential, and other writers came out in support of such views: Lionel Tollemache wrote in favour of euthanasia, as did Annie Besant, the essayist and reformer who later became involved with the National Secular Society, considering it a duty to society to "die voluntarily and painlessly" when one reaches the point of becoming a 'burden'.[38][39]Popular Science analyzed the issue in May 1873, assessing both sides of the argument.[40] Kemp notes that at the time, medical doctors did not participate in the discussion; it was "essentially a philosophical enterprise ... tied inextricably to a number of objections to the Christian doctrine of the sanctity of human life".[38]

Early euthanasia movement in the United States

Main article: Euthanasia in the United States

The rise of the euthanasia movement in the United States coincided with the so-called Gilded Age, a time of social and technological change that encompassed an "individualistic conservatism that praised laissez-faire economics, scientific method, and rationalism", along with major depressions, industrialisation and conflict between corporations and labour unions.[37]:794 It was also the period in which the modern hospital system was developed, which has been seen as a factor in the emergence of the euthanasia debate.[41]

Robert Ingersoll argued for euthanasia, stating in 1894 that where someone is suffering from a terminal illness, such as terminal cancer, they should have a right to end their pain through suicide. Felix Adler offered a similar approach, although, unlike Ingersoll, Adler did not reject religion. In fact, he argued from an Ethical Culture framework. In 1891, Alder argued that those suffering from overwhelming pain should have the right to commit suicide, and, furthermore, that it should be permissible for a doctor to assist – thus making Adler the first "prominent American" to argue for suicide in cases where people were suffering from chronic illness.[42] Both Ingersoll and Adler argued for voluntary euthanasia of adults suffering from terminal ailments.[42] Dowbiggin argues that by breaking down prior moral objections to euthanasia and suicide, Ingersoll and Adler enabled others to stretch the definition of euthanasia.[43]

The first attempt to legalise euthanasia took place in the United States, when Henry Hunt introduced legislation into the General Assembly of Ohio in 1906.[44]:614 Hunt did so at the behest of Anna S. Hall, a wealthy heiress who was a major figure in the euthanasia movement during the early 20th century in the United States. Hall had watched her mother die after an extended battle with liver cancer, and had dedicated herself to ensuring that others would not have to endure the same suffering. Towards this end she engaged in an extensive letter writing campaign, recruited Lurana Sheldon and Maud Ballington Booth, and organised a debate on euthanasia at the annual meeting of the American Humane Association in 1905 – described by Jacob Appel as the first significant public debate on the topic in the 20th century.[44]:614–616

Hunt's bill called for the administration of an anesthetic to bring about a patient's death, so long as the person is of lawful age and sound mind, and was suffering from a fatal injury, an irrevocable illness, or great physical pain. It also required that the case be heard by a physician, required informed consent in front of three witnesses, and required the attendance of three physicians who had to agree that the patient's recovery was impossible. A motion to reject the bill outright was voted down, but the bill failed to pass, 79 to 23.[37]:796[44]:618–619

Along with the Ohio euthanasia proposal, in 1906 Assemblyman Ross Gregory introduced a proposal to permit euthanasia to the Iowa legislature. However, the Iowa legislation was broader in scope than that offered in Ohio. It allowed for the death of any person of at least ten years of age who suffered from an ailment that would prove fatal and cause extreme pain, should they be of sound mind and express a desire to artificially hasten their death. In addition, it allowed for infants to be euthanised if they were sufficiently deformed, and permitted guardians to request euthanasia on behalf of their wards. The proposed legislation also imposed penalties on physicians who refused to perform euthanasia when requested: a 6–12 month prison term and a fine of between $200 and $1,000. The proposal proved to be controversial.[44]:619–621 It engendered considerable debate and failed to pass, having been withdrawn from consideration after being passed to the Committee on Public Health.[44]:623

After 1906 the euthanasia debate reduced in intensity, resurfacing periodically, but not returning to the same level of debate until the 1930s in the United Kingdom.[37]:796

Euthanasia opponent Ian Dowbiggin argues that the early membership of the Euthanasia Society of America (ESA) reflected how many perceived euthanasia at the time, often seeing it as a eugenics matter rather than an issue concerning individual rights.[42] Dowbiggin argues that not every eugenist joined the ESA "solely for eugenic reasons", but he postulates that there were clear ideological connections between the eugenics and euthanasia movements.[42]

1930s in Britain

The Voluntary Euthanasia Legalisation Society was founded in 1935 by Charles Killick Millard (now called Dignity in Dying). The movement campaigned for the legalisation of euthanasia in Great Britain.

In January 1936, King George V was given a fatal dose of morphine and cocaine to hasten his death. At the time he was suffering from cardio-respiratory failure, and the decision to end his life was made by his physician, Lord Dawson.[45] Although this event was kept a secret for over 50 years, the death of George V coincided with proposed legislation in the House of Lords to legalise euthanasia.[46]

Nazi Euthanasia Program

Main article: Action T4

A 24 July 1939 killing of a severely disabled infant in Nazi Germany was described in a BBC "Genocide Under the Nazis Timeline" as the first "state-sponsored euthanasia".[47] Parties that consented to the killing included Hitler's office, the parents, and the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registration of Serious and Congenitally Based Illnesses.[47]The Telegraph noted that the killing of the disabled infant—whose name was Gerhard Kretschmar, born blind, with missing limbs, subject to convulsions, and reportedly "an idiot"— provided "the rationale for a secret Nazi decree that led to 'mercy killings' of almost 300,000 mentally and physically handicapped people".[48] While Kretchmar's killing received parental consent, most of the 5,000 to 8,000 children killed afterwards were forcibly taken from their parents.[47][48]

The "euthanasia campaign" of mass murder gathered momentum on 14 January 1940 when the "handicapped" were killed with gas vans and killing centres, eventually leading to the deaths of 70,000 adult Germans.[49] Professor Robert Jay Lifton, author of The Nazi Doctors and a leading authority on the T4 program, contrasts this program with what he considers to be a genuine euthanasia. He explains that the Nazi version of "euthanasia" was based on the work of Adolf Jost, who published The Right to Death (Das Recht auf den Tod) in 1895. Lifton writes:

Jost argued that control over the death of the individual must ultimately belong to the social organism, the state. This concept is in direct opposition to the Anglo-American concept of euthanasia, which emphasizes the individual's 'right to die' or 'right to death' or 'right to his or her own death,' as the ultimate human claim. In contrast, Jost was pointing to the state's right to kill. ... Ultimately the argument was biological: 'The rights to death [are] the key to the fitness of life.' The state must own death—must kill—in order to keep the social organism alive and healthy.[50]

In modern terms, the use of "euthanasia" in the context of Action T4 is seen to be a euphemism to disguise a program of genocide, in which people were killed on the grounds of "disabilities, religious beliefs, and discordant individual values".[51] Compared to the discussions of euthanasia that emerged post-war, the Nazi program may have been worded in terms that appear similar to the modern use of "euthanasia", but there was no "mercy" and the patients were not necessarily terminally ill.[51] Despite these differences, historian and euthanasia opponent Ian Dowbiggin writes that "the origins of Nazi euthanasia, like those of the American euthanasia movement, predate the Third Reich and were intertwined with the history of eugenics and Social Darwinism, and with efforts to discredit traditional morality and ethics."[42]:65

The 1949 New York State Petition for Euthanasia and Catholic Opposition

On 6 January 1949, the Euthanasia Society of America presented to the New York State Legislature a petition to legalize euthanasia, signed by 379 leading Protestant and Jewish ministers, the largest group of religious leaders ever to have taken this stance. A similar petition had been sent to the New York Legislature in 1947, signed by approximately 1,000 New York physicians. Catholic religious leaders criticized the petition, saying that such a bill would "legalize a suicide-murder pact" and a "rationalization of the fifth commandment of God, 'Thou Shalt Not Kill.'"[52] The Right Reverend Robert E. McCormick stated that

"The ultimate object of the Euthanasia Society is based on the Totalitarian principle that the state is supreme and that the individual does not have the right to live if his continuance in life is a burden or hindrance to the state. The Nazis followed this principle and compulsory Euthanasia was practiced as a part of their program during the recent war. We American citizens of New York State must ask ourselves this question: 'Are we going to finish Hitler's job?'"[52]

The petition brought tensions between the American Euthanasia Society and the Catholic Church to a head that contributed to a climate of anti-Catholic sentiment generally, regarding issues such as birth control, eugenics, and population control. However, the petition did not result in any legal changes.[42]

Euthanasia debate

Historically, the euthanasia debate has tended to focus on a number of key concerns. According to euthanasia opponent Ezekiel Emanuel, proponents of euthanasia have presented four main arguments: a) that people have a right to self-determination, and thus should be allowed to choose their own fate; b) assisting a subject to die might be a better choice than requiring that they continue to suffer; c) the distinction between passive euthanasia, which is often permitted, and active euthanasia, which is not substantive (or that the underlying principle–the doctrine of double effect–is unreasonable or unsound); and d) permitting euthanasia will not necessarily lead to unacceptable consequences. Pro-euthanasia activists often point to countries like the Netherlands and Belgium, and states like Oregon, where euthanasia has been legalized, to argue that it is mostly unproblematic.

Similarly, Emanuel argues that there are four major arguments presented by opponents of euthanasia: a) not all deaths are painful; b) alternatives, such as cessation of active treatment, combined with the use of effective pain relief, are available; c) the distinction between active and passive euthanasia is morally significant; and d) legalising euthanasia will place society on a slippery slope,[53] which will lead to unacceptable consequences.[37]:797-8 In fact, in Oregon, in 2013, pain wasn't one of the top five reasons people sought euthanasia. Top reasons were a loss of dignity, and a fear of burdening others.[54]

In the United States in 2013, 47% nationwide supported doctor-assisted suicide. This included 32% of Latinos, 29% of African-Americans, and almost nobody with disabilities.[54]

Legal status

Main article: Legality of euthanasia

West's Encyclopedia of American Law states that "a 'mercy killing' or euthanasia is generally considered to be a criminal homicide"[55] and is normally used as a synonym of homicide committed at a request made by the patient.[56]

The judicial sense of the term "homicide" includes any intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, even to relieve intractable suffering.[56][57][58] Not all homicide is unlawful.[59] Two designations of homicide that carry no criminal punishment are justifiable and excusable homicide.[59] In most countries this is not the status of euthanasia. The term "euthanasia" is usually confined to the active variety; the University of Washington website states that "euthanasia generally means that the physician would act directly, for instance by giving a lethal injection, to end the patient's life".[60]Physician-assisted suicide is thus not classified as euthanasia by the US State of Oregon, where it is legal under the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, and despite its name, it is not legally classified as suicide either.[61] Unlike physician-assisted suicide, withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments with patient consent (voluntary) is almost unanimously considered, at least in the United States, to be legal.[62] The use of pain medication to relieve suffering, even if it hastens death, has been held as legal in several court decisions.[60]

Some governments around the world have legalized voluntary euthanasia but most commonly it is still considered to be criminal homicide. In the Netherlands and Belgium, where euthanasia has been legalized, it still remains homicide although it is not prosecuted and not punishable if the perpetrator (the doctor) meets certain legal conditions.[63][64][65][66]

Physician sentiment

A 2010 survey in the United States of more than 10,000 physicians found that 16.3% of physicians would consider halting life-sustaining therapy because the family demanded it, even if they believed that it was premature. Approximately 54.5% would not, and the remaining 29.2% responded "it depends".[67] The study also found that 45.8% of physicians agreed that physician-assisted suicide should be allowed in some cases; 40.7% did not, and the remaining 13.5% felt it depended.[67]

In the United Kingdom, the pro-assisted dying group Dignity in Dying cite conflicting research on attitudes by doctors to assisted dying: with a 2009 Palliative Medicine-published survey showing 64% support (to 34% oppose) for assisted dying in cases where a patient has an incurable and painful disease, while 49% of doctors in a study published in BMC Medical Ethics oppose changing the law on assisted dying to 39% in favour.[68]

Religious views


Broadly against

The Roman Catholic Church strongly opposes and condemns euthanasia and assisted suicide as morally wrong. The Catholic Church states that, "Intentional euthanasia, whatever its forms or motives, is murder. It is gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator". Because of this, the practice is unacceptable within the Church.[69] The Orthodox Church in America, along with other Eastern Orthodox Churches, also opposes euthanasia stating that it must be condemned as murder stating that, "Euthanasia is the deliberate cessation to end human life."[70]

Many non-Catholic churches in the United States take a stance against euthanasia. Among Protestant denominations, the Episcopal Church passed a resolution in 1991 opposing euthanasia and assisted suicide stating that is "morally wrong and unacceptable to take a human life to relieve the suffering caused by incurable illnesses." [70] Other Protestant churches which oppose euthanasia include:

Partially in favor of

The Church of England accepts passive euthanasia under some circumstances, but is strongly against active euthanasia, and has led opposition against recent attempt to legalise it.[80] The United Church of Canada accepts passive euthanasia under some circumstances, but is in general against active euthanasia, with growing acceptance now that active euthanasia has been partly legalised in Canada.[81].


Euthanasia is a complex issue in Islamic theology; however, in general it is considered contrary to Islamic law and holy texts. Among interpretations of the Koran and Hadith, the early termination of life is a crime, be it by suicide or helping one commit suicide. The various positions on the cessation of medical treatment are mixed and considered a different class of action than direct termination of life, especially if the patient is suffering. Suicide and euthanasia are both crimes in almost all Muslim majority countries.[82]


There is much debate on the topic of euthanasia in Judaic theology, ethics, and general opinion (especially in Israel and the United States). Passive euthanasia was declared legal by Israel's highest court under certain conditions and has reached some level of acceptance. Active euthanasia remains illegal, however the topic is actively under debate with no clear consensus through legal, ethical, theological and spiritual perspectives.[83]

See also


  1. ^"Euthanasia". Worldrtd.net. Retrieved 2017-07-06.  
  2. ^"Voluntary Euthanasia (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)". Plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2017-07-06. 
  3. ^ abcdHarris, NM. (October 2001). "The euthanasia debate". J R Army Med Corps. 147 (3): 367–70. doi:10.1136/jramc-147-03-22. PMID 11766225. 
  4. ^Euthanasia and assisted suicideBBC. Last reviewed June 2011. Accessed 25 July 2011. Archived from the original Archived 19 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
  5. ^Carr, Claudia (2014). Unlocking Medical Law and Ethics (2nd ed.). Routledge. p. 374. ISBN 9781317743514. Retrieved 2 February 2018. 
  6. ^Voluntary and involuntary euthanasiaBBC Accessed 12 February 2012. Archived from the original Archived 5 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
  7. ^Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K (April 2006). "Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis". J Med Ethics. 32 (4): 240–45. doi:10.1136/jme.2004.011478. PMC 2565792. PMID 16574880. 
  8. ^Philippe Letellier, chapter: History and Definition of a Word, in Euthanasia: Ethical and Human Aspects By Council of Europe
  9. ^Francis Bacon: The Major Works by Francis Bacon, edited by Brian Vickers, p. 630.
  10. ^Kohl, Marvin (1974). The Morality of Killing. New York: Humanities Press. p. 94. , quoted in Beauchamp & Davidson (1979), p 294. A similar definition is offered by Blackburn (1994) with "the action of causing the quick and painless death of a person, or not acting to prevent it when prevention was within the agent's powers."
  11. ^ abcdeBeauchamp, Tom L.; Davidson, Arnold I. (1979). "The Definition of Euthanasia". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 4 (3): 294–312. doi:10.1093/jmp/4.3.294. PMID 501249. 
  12. ^ abDraper, Heather (1998). "Euthanasia". In Chadwick, Ruth. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. 2. Academic Press. 
  13. ^"euthanasia". Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. April 2010. Retrieved 26 April 2011. 
  14. ^Kohl, Marvin; Kurtz, Paul (1975). "A Plea for Beneficient Euthanasia". In Kohl, Marvin. Beneficient Euthanasia. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books. p. 94. , quoted in Beauchamp & Davidson (1979), p 295.
  15. ^Wreen, Michael (1988). "The Definition of Euthanasia". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 48 (4): 637–53 [639]. doi:10.2307/2108012. JSTOR 2108012. 
  16. ^Brody, Baruch (1975). "Voluntary Euthanasia and the Law". In Kohl, Marvin. Beneficient Euthanasia. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books. p. 94.
Felix Adler, circa 1913, the first prominent American to argue for permitting suicide in cases of chronic illness

One thought on “Hoe Werkt Actieve Euthanasia Essay

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *